So x is true, but we do not know that x is true.

The sentence "X is an unknown truth" is so true.

If all truths are recognizable, it should be possible to know that "X is an unknown truth" be.

But that is not possible; As soon as we know "X is an unknown truth", we know X, and so is x, a lie is no longer an unknown truth and "X is an unknown truth".

The statement "X is an unknown truth" at the same time, both well known and can be true not.

Therefore contain, if all truths can be identified, the group "all truths" any form "something is an unknown truth".

It may need to be known no unknown truths, and thus all truths.

Solipsistfags problem?

View the original article here