Questions and suggestions to the everyday life of post office opening hours eBay queries or what you to buy your favourite for her birthday. 18 Minutes ago: 2. July 2011 21: 02 Re: parents are stupid, but I'm smart high IQ level in a basketball player, they both strongly affected on Genetics is similar.

How can you look at someone with a low IQ (say 70), smart? This is statistically unfair. Someone with an IQ is statistically, because not even 0.2% of the world's population, which get a genius. Moreover, such IQ is more likely to be someone with an IQ of 85 out of about 2000% successful. Unless the latter who wins the lottery or something. IQ tests show not only can you answer a few questions, but actually you test brain functions. For example get young in the rule later get higher when using spatial during girl when dealing with Linguistics. It is a biological process that has undergone development.

So would someone with an IQ of 95 as stupid, immediately and someone with an IQ of 170 as smart call?

Because if that is the case, then, that someone with an IQ of 170 is "smarter" than someone with an IQ of 169 would say. Am I right?

10 Minutes ago: 2. July 2011 21: 09 Re: parents are stupid, but I'm smart my mum is stupid. Everything she does is drink, react slowly, moaning, smoking, questions, stupid questions and their income and education is low. It is generally only stupid.

My father does not work yet. I know him, but he lives in a House rubbish, lazy, has no family and lives of use. I know, not really, to judge him, but this would one derive, that he is stupid, included.

Despite everything (and I'm not boast, because I am not a genius) I do not consider myself stupid, and my mental faculties confirm the vast majority of those who talk to me.

They say that IQ is hereditary, therefore I should not stupid? Or am I just an exception? My sister is smart: it is a fast learner and she has a university degree. We have different fathers, but her father is just like me. I am my mum underestimate or are we just lucky?

+ Rep. I LOL'd 7 minutes ago: 2. July 2011 21: 12   Re: parents are stupid, but I'm smart so that you immediately someone with an IQ of 95 as stupid, and anyone with an IQ of 170 would smart call?

Because if that is the case, then, that someone with an IQ of 170 is "smarter" than someone with an IQ of 169 would say. Am I right?

No, all humans are intelligent, because Homosapiens species are more advanced. Someone with an IQ of 95 is not 'stupid', but it is average or slightly we integrate below if statistics. Someone with an IQ of 170 is statistically 'smart'. However, "smart" is subjective. Could someone with an IQ of 170 evil and immoral. Therefore "stupid" could call people for their misconduct.

There is great significance in intelligence between someone with 95 and 170. If every person had an IQ of 170, mankind would be achieved much more. We could on the planet Mars have been, if that was the case. Of course someone, 1 point higher on an IQ test scored, is not just smarter. As a result, a cultural difference or silly mistake could have happened.

Try to say that you have a chance against someone like Einstein/Isaac Newton/Pythagoros in intelligence?

Edit: the consensus is that anyone with an IQ of 70 or below on the borderline of mental retardation.

Last edited by Personified; 4 Forward, by 21: 15 minutes. 1 Minute ago: 2. July 2011 21: 20 Re: parents are stupid, but I'm smart no, all people are intelligent, because Homosapiens species are more advanced. Someone with an IQ of 95 is not 'stupid', but it is average or slightly we integrate below if statistics. Someone with an IQ of 170 is statistically 'smart'. However, "smart" is subjective. Could someone with an IQ of 170 evil and immoral. Therefore "stupid" could call people for their misconduct.

There is great significance in intelligence between someone with 95 and 170. If every person had an IQ of 170, mankind would be achieved much more. We could on the planet Mars have been, if that was the case. Of course someone, 1 point higher on an IQ test scored, is not just smarter. As a result, a cultural difference or silly mistake could have happened.

Try to say that you have a chance against someone like Einstein/Isaac Newton/Pythagoros in intelligence?

Edit: the consensus is that anyone with an IQ of 70 or below on the borderline of mental retardation.

This is what I was questions like the above had made clear they do not really, it's not good to determine peoples intelligence of IQ, it is a stupid test with stupid questions. It is better to judge merit and what they have actually achieved.

Did you know that Charles Darwin had an IQ of more than 130?

View the original article here