Discuss the merits and the shortcomings of political theories and philosophical questions. 30 Minutes ago: 19 July 2011 01: 42 what is the difference between "man made" and natural? 1) when people are products of nature...

(2) To survive our brains and the physical tools that we have received from nature and to promote, so maybe they are our people, what are products of nature...

(3) So everything we invent is a product of our tools, [skyscrapers, aircraft, weapons of mass destruction, and so on] and perhaps our inventions to should be considered as products of nature...

With this in mind, is how it is possible to distinguish between something "man-made" and "natural"? It is believed that one of the people caused forces have terribly with the nature and causes irreversible damage to the environment, but if we are part of nature, we are really upset?
It is something that always confuses me has!

13 Minutes ago: 19 July 2011 01: 58 Re: what is the difference between "man made" and natural? Is now, what a ' tool ' anyway? The original tools where stones or sticks, but they do not 'tools' to people become a use which was beyond what it obviously had developed, in order to find. And that's what I think, is the distinction between "man made" and "natural". A computer is not found "naturally" without a designer, all in the Universum.Ich said only our brains and our hands & etc... Basically physical characteristics of us who help us to survive, not rocks or sticks. Our brains and physical tools we were given by nature to survive... Last edited by an aspiring guy; 12 Minutes, around 18: 00 10 minutes ago: 19 July 2011 02: 02 Re: what is the difference between "man made" and natural? On the way we use the words in a normal conversation is the use of "natural" vague.

When we say "of course", or a specially, if we are "natural" to "Man made", the term "naturally" arbitrarily contrast referred to, that than that in which nature is; but not that which is a product of man.

The use of the term is any distorted. Children are homo sapiens as natural as Homo sapiens, it is only products that they produce or conduct that they show which other species that do not apply are unnatural (any).

Last edited by Obstupefacere; 9 Minutes on 02: 03. 6 minutes ago: 19 July 2011 02: 06 Re: what is the difference between "man made" and natural? 1) when people are products of nature...

(2) To survive our brains and the physical tools that we have received from nature and to promote, so maybe they are our people, what are products of nature...

(3) So everything we invent is a product of our tools, [skyscrapers, aircraft, weapons of mass destruction, and so on] and perhaps our inventions to should be considered as products of nature...

With this in mind, is how it is possible to distinguish between something "man-made" and "natural"? It is believed that one of the people caused forces have terribly with the nature and causes irreversible damage to the environment, but if we are part of nature, we are really upset?
It is something that always confuses me has!

Things that are described as "man-made" or "artificial" could be better than that is explicitly designed are described. She did not enter the life without an external Designer. It was a conscious for a purpose to design.

Natural things to (coined the term of Richard Dawkins use) "Designoid" - designed may, while they appear they are in fact not, and will have, but simply exist of their own accord without an external Designer. No conscious design process.

About degree is whether our actions could really be considered as harmful for natures, certainly in a sense we're just part of the process of development and adjustment to avoid something for other species, but in other ways, we force changes at a rate that is too fast, is a lot for natural processes to customize it.

4 Minutes ago: 19 July 2011 02: 08 Re: what is the difference between "man made" and natural? I thought only our brains and our hands & etc.... In fact, physical features of us who help us to survive, not stones or Sticks.Ich see the distinction you make, especially the "physical tools" idea, but I maintain my previous point. "Physical tools" have developed naturally, without design or planning, while 'Tools' (pliers, wrench, computer, cars, etc.) have developed through concious design and planning.

The "natural" existence of the brain made inevitable, not the existence of these additional tools even though it was the designer.

View the original article here