Set containing all sets?

Set containing all sets?

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
It's fine for a set to contain itself, there is no contradiction. Not sure about a set containing all sets.

Edit: thought about it. If a set containing all sets does not contain itself, then it is missing itself and therefore not a set containing all sets. If a set containing all sets does contain itself, then it also becomes a subset of itself as well, thus because it is a subset of another set, it does not contain that larger set, so there is a contradiction. Those are my thoughts.

Last edited by miser; 1 Hour Ago at 00:30.

View the original article here