Premise. I started just a PhD, which essentially developed the version of my is MA dissertation; Both my superiors are aware that the other developed and have no problem with it, as long as there enough difference for PhD work as a whole is classified to be as original.

I am currently working on the pilot project for my academic year integrated, which amounts to a draft of the introduction (12, 000w) in my doctoral thesis (80, 000w). Assuming that, if I to show where I can not avoid my thought's on the subject, I already done covers the part of the ground actively ok for me not only 1 have it while working on my dissertation, MA you quote me but 2. critique my last work?

Along the lines of ' I have experienced this problem in my dissertation MA, which is what was valuable and this is, what was rubbish on my approach, so that this is what is going on my new approach be '? We're talking about here are a few paragraphs here tops, I think. I don't see why should there be a problem, but I this whole originality have hammered request home so hard, I don't know the simplest things.

Cheers, any input appreciated.

View the original article here